Sunday, October 21, 2012

Impossible REALLY?


So it came up in class (as I am pretty sure it does in the process of EVERY conversation about communism EVER) that communism seems so unlikely and maybe even impossible because “people just wouldn’t do it.”  One way to look at any existing or possible economic system differently, though, is to see it as a part of the human construct.  This of course does not mean that economic systems are not real and do not have very real effects on people’s lives, but it means that the system does not ONLY work on individuals because individuals ALSO work on (form) the system.  So from a sociological standpoint, we (that is, people) create economic systems (like capitalism) and social values (like individualism) which might disallow a communist society from existing.  But what that means is that the power to CREATE those things is ours—it is not “innate” or “destined” or “natural” for people to live with the particular systems or values that we live with.  So I believe that a communist society is completely possible but only as far as people believe it is too, because to consciously shape the systems of one’s society, one must first become aware that he or she plays a role in shaping them.
Also…
The idea that humans are innately flawed or evil or selfish is a commonly held one, I think, and we experience things that seem to point to the legitimacy of that idea for sure.  But what about that idea that there’s some good in everyone, too?  I further think that such a community would actually be possible because I think that people ARE actually “good” in general.  I read an article called "Why Are People "Irrationally" Generous to Strangers?" that talks about a study addressing people’s tendencies to reach out and help people even when they don’t know them.  The study essentially finds that people have actually evolved to be kind and outreaching, which seemingly conflicts with Darwin’s longstanding view that evolution (much like capitalism) is driven by competition and always champions the most fit over the least (the elite bourgeausie over the working proletariat).  But it turns out that people ready to cooperate with others have a better chance of benefiting from any relationships that might result, meaning that cooperation is a trait of humans that evolution favors—a trait that wins when compared to “defecting” social interractions (refusing to cooperate).  The author, Ronald Bailey even says that “being nice is a winning strategy when it comes to economics and evolution.”
So knowing that we create our economic system just as thoroughly as it creates us AND knowing that generosity (community-minded perhaps?) gives an evolutionary advantage to people, do you agree that communism could be possible (even if only on a small-ish scale and not in the near future)?  Is there any hope or chance that we will enter Marx’s last epoch of history??

2 comments:

  1. I think that if the greed of the initial leaders can be controlled, then I think it is definitely possible to create a communist system. I am not convinced how sustainable it is simply because this requires something akin to the benevolent monarch or the Enlightened Ruler, which I truly do not think exists at least not in a sustainable manner. This is quite probably because of the fact that I am so indoctrinated into the logic of capital that I cannot imagine everyone or even the greater majority of people acting in such a way, but there it is, I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that some sort of Marxist system is, in our current state, realistically impossible. However, I agree with your arguments that it is entirely up to humanity to create its own economic system, but essentially every world power looks at Marxism and sees, first and foremost, the failure of the USSR. Maybe had Soviet Union successfully "won" the Cold War, we would be having this same discussion about capitalism, but I think, to quote James, "the greed of the initial leaders" was not controlled in early attempts at large-scale communism. On the other hand, there have been plenty of examples of small communities living under essentially socialist ideas. The key to them though, is their isolation from the rest of society at large. In my opinion, capitalism has been to ingrained in the vast majority of people to ever move humanity on a large scale towards socialism.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.