Although we didn’t go into great
detail about Jean-Jacque Rousseau or Mary Wollstonecraft during class, I wanted
to call attention to the great difference these two people had in their
theories of female education.
Wollstonecraft, being a woman
during the Enlightenment Era, was a huge advocate of progression in female education,
proclaiming that women should be equal to men because women have just as much
to offer society as men do. Rousseau, on the other hand, believed women should
be tamed, sheltered, and held back from any type of knowledge not pertaining to
the household. Wollstonecraft’s origin of her progressive idealism is clear: as
a woman in a patriarchal society she wishes to also be seen as equally
contributive to society. Rousseau, however, seems to be contradictory in his
beliefs. His essay Origin of Inequality among
Men seems to indicate that he understands and has explored the subject of
inequality greatly, almost seeming as he would not be contradictory in his
conclusion about women and their place in society. Although, his title does
include the specification “Men” and not, per se, “People.” I have also not read this essay but only a
mere summary, and the summary indicated that females were not included in this
discourse besides being a primal instinct and priority for men. How could
someone so influential from an era of great, progressive, revolutionary
thinking remain so focused on an idea that is so outdated and hackneyed,
considering the fact that women themselves were arguing for their social and
political status during the same time? Were men so focused on being served that
they could idealize new governments, societies, economies, but not new social
statuses for women?
I also wonder how strong that
stereotype and expectation of women is even today. From watching other
relationships of those close to me, I know that the concept has still not completely
vanished even with our modern thought. What could still be holding society back
from giving women equal treatment and expectations as men? What are society’s
current views of independent women who take control and use their intelligence
and motivation to become successful? Will these views always remain, as they
have for hundreds, even thousands of years? What can anyone do to refute these archaic
ideas and expectations of women and the hierarchy of society? Tell me what you
think.
In response to the presented notion of a contemporary double standard for men and women, I can agree that women today have still not by some standards achieved the same respect as men. For instance, although women are growing to be more and more prevalent and involved in the legal and political fields in the U.S., it is still men who are predominantly viewed as the primary leader personalities and who are most commonly elected to governmental positions. Following with this idea, I believe that women do have to work harder even today to get ahead in most professions. However, women ARE accomplished today in most professions, at least within the U.S., and I believe that when women of today are strongly independent and use their minds to become accomplished, their chances are just as good as men's. In my opinion, despite gender stereotypes about whether a man or a woman is better suited for a certain job/position, if a woman is determined and strives to be the best and most suited for what she wants it won't matter whether a man is in the running. As negative gender stereotypes slowly fade out of our society, it's less about being good enough anymore and more about being better than the competition.
ReplyDelete